skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices

Neal L. Slifkin

Member

nslifkin@harrisbeachmurtha.com
D: (585) 419-8636  
- Rochester, NY Office
Linkedin
Address-card

< Swipe >

Neal Slifkin
Profile
Representative Matters
Resources
Distinctions

Neal litigates all types of intellectual property actions including patent, trademark, copyright, and trade dress infringement actions. He has served as counsel in numerous intellectual property actions pending in the United States District Courts for the Western, Northern, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. He has litigated over eighty patent infringement actions in district courts.

In addition to representing clients in litigation, Neal advises clients in the optics, telecommunications, sporting goods, wastewater treatment and financial services industries and represents technology companies in negotiating and documenting intellectual property transactions, including product development projects and intellectual property purchases, sales and licensing.

Neal also prepares and prosecutes patent applications in a wide variety of technologies including medical devices, complex mechanical systems, optical technologies, sporting goods, electrical components, lighting components, and others.  He has also prosecuted patent appeals before the Patent Board of Appeals and Interferences.

Neal maintains an active trademark practice, prosecuting trademark applications and handling inter partes proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.  He maintains the international trademark portfolios of numerous clients engaged in global commerce.

  • Greatbatch Ltd. v. AVX Corp. et al. (U.S. District Court, D. Del. 2019): Represented patent owner in patent infringement action over key components for pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Jury verdicts found infringement of three U.S. Patents, and awarded lost profits and price erosion. Judgment on the jury verdict exceeded $27 million in damages.
  • Izzo Golf, Inc. v. King Par Golf, Inc. (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2010): Plaintiff's counsel in a patent infringement action resulting in a jury verdict and finding of willful infringement ultimately totaling approximately $12 million.
  • Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Conan 716, Inc. (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2022): Represented Broadcast Music, Inc. in copyright infringement litigation.
  • Broadcast Music, Inc. v. ROKDOK LLC (U.S District Court, N.D.N.Y, 2019): Represented Broadcast Music, Inc. in copyright infringement litigation.
  • Jaccard Corp. v. Keystone Mfg. (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2008): Counsel for plaintiff in jury trial resulting in successful prosecution of trade dress infringement claim.
  • John King Chains Limited v. John King USA, Inc. (U.S. District Court, C.D. Ill., 2017): Represented a United Kingdom company in a trademark dispute, in the Central District of Illinois, with the company’s former U.S. affiliate, resulting in the affiliate agreeing to cease using the disputed trademarks.
  • Eastman Kodak v. Sun Microsystems (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2002): Co-counsel for Kodak in patent infringement claim involving Java Run Time and Java Virtual Machine.
  • Eastman Kodak v. Sony Corp. (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2004): Co-counsel for Kodak in patent infringement claim involving digital imaging.
  • Amesbury Products v. Caldwell Manufacturing (U.S. District Court, D. Mass., 2008): Defense counsel in a patent infringement suit involving patents for window balances.
  • Frink America v. Champion Road Machinery Ltd. (U.S. District Court, N.D.N.Y., 1996): Plaintiff’s jury verdict for $5.3 million in an action for misappropriation of intellectual property.
  • Redcom Laboratories v. Cisco Systems (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2000): Plaintiff’s counsel in multimillion dollar settlement of patent infringement claim involving telephone switching equipment.
  • Laser Diode Array, Inc. v. Paradigm Lasers (U.S. District Court, N.D.N.Y., 1996): Representation of Paradigm through a successful Markman hearing resulting in voluntary dismissal of action.
  • Bevin Barber v. Terry Precision (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2001): Counsel for Terry Precision in trademark infringement action.
  • Ltg. Ltd. v. MaxLite-S.K. America (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board): Representation of MaxLite in trademark opposition action.
  • Faster Form v. Portney (U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y., 2003): Representation of Faster Form in trade dress infringement action.
  • Broadcast Music Inc. v. Millennium Billiards (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2002): Representation of Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) in copyright infringement action.
Insights
March 21, 2023

Unitary Patent System Launching in Europe – Patent Holders May Need to Take Action

European patent owners may want to take action to opt certain patents out of the new Unitary Patent System.
August 28, 2020

The Strongest Link: Decisive Legal Action Protects Clients from Trademark and Copyright Infringement

Counterfeits and subpar knockoffs can tarnish the image and reputation of even the most established brands – and that’s especially true when
News
September 29, 2026

41 Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys Selected to 2026 Upstate New York Super Lawyers® and Super Lawyers: Rising Stars® Lists

The list recognizes accomplished attorneys who have achieved a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.
August 20, 2026

123 Harris Beach Murtha Lawyers Recognized as 2027 Best Lawyers® Award Recipients; 10 Earn “Lawyer of the Year” Recognition

Best Lawyers honorees are selected through a peer-review process evaluating professional excellence within specific practice areas and geogr
September 29, 2025

36 Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys Selected to 2025 Upstate New York Super Lawyers® and Super Lawyers: Rising Stars® Lists

Super Lawyers is a national ranking service of accomplished attorneys who have achieved a high degree of professional achievement.
August 21, 2025

More Than 100 Harris Beach Murtha Lawyers Recognized as 2026 Best Lawyers® Award Recipients; 11 Earn “Lawyer of the Year” Recognition

Best Lawyers provides trusted, peer-reviewed recognition of top legal professionals, helping clients find credible, experienced counsel.
August 22, 2024

30 Harris Beach Attorneys Named in 2024 Upstate New York Super Lawyers Edition

Nine attorneys were named Upstate New York Rising Stars, a category that focuses on attorneys who have practiced for 10 years or less.
September 25, 2023

Neal Slifkin, Jim Muldoon Named to The Daily Record Power 20

Partners Neal Slifkin and Jim Muldoon have been named to the Power 20 Intellectual Property Law list by The Daily Record of Western New York
September 22, 2022

Daily Record Recognizes Partners Neal Slifkin and Jim Muldoon

For the second consecutive year, The Daily Record of Western New York has named Partners Neal Slifkin and Jim Muldoon to its Power 20 Intell
March 21, 2022

Partners Jim Muldoon and Neal Slifkin Named Power 20 Lawyers in Intellectual Property

As we go deeper into what’s been referred to as the “information age,” the task of the intellectual property attorney has gotten more compli
Events

Laura Smalley and Neal Slifkin Complimentary Patent Law CLE Webinar Recording

January 14, 2021
Damages are a critical part of a patent infringement case. This webinar addresses the current state of the law on patent damages, including
External Publications

Professional and Civic

  • International Trademark Association, Leadership Committee
  • Rochester Regional Photonics Cluster, board member
  • Young Entrepreneurs Academy, mentor

Recognition

  • Super Lawyers, Intellectual Property and Intellectual Property Litigation, 2011-2021 and since 2024
  • Best Lawyers, Copyright Law, since 2018
  • Best Lawyers, Litigation – Patent, since 2013
  • Best Lawyers, Litigation – Intellectual Property, since 2018
  • Best Lawyers, Patent Law, since 2020
  • Best Lawyers, Trademark Law, since 2020
  • Best Lawyers, Lawyer of the Year, Litigation – Patent, 2020, 2024, 2026
  • Best Lawyers, Lawyer of the Year, Litigation – Intellectual Property, 2021, 2024
Admissions
District of ColumbiaNew YorkPennsylvaniaU.S. Court of Appeals, Federal CircuitU.S. Court of Appeals, Second CircuitU.S. District Court, Illinois – Central DistrictU.S. District Court, Michigan - Eastern DistrictU.S. District Court, Michigan - Western DistrictU.S. District Court, New York - Eastern DistrictU.S. District Court, New York - Northern DistrictU.S. District Court, New York - Southern DistrictU.S. District Court, New York - Western DistrictU.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Education

University of Pittsburgh School of Law

JD 
1989

Pennsylvania State University

BS 
1986

Capabilities

Legal Practices

Leader for:

Member of:

Intellectual Property

Industry Teams

Leader for:

Member of:

Industrial and Consumer Manufacturing
Gaming, Hospitality and Retail
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top
Neal Slifkin

Neal L. Slifkin

Member

nslifkin@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Neal Slifkin

Neal L. Slifkin

nslifkin@harrisbeachmurtha.com
D: (585) 419-8636
Rochester, NY Office

Profile

Neal litigates all types of intellectual property actions including patent, trademark, copyright, and trade dress infringement actions. He has served as counsel in numerous intellectual property actions pending in the United States District Courts for the Western, Northern, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. He has litigated over eighty patent infringement actions in district courts.

In addition to representing clients in litigation, Neal advises clients in the optics, telecommunications, sporting goods, wastewater treatment and financial services industries and represents technology companies in negotiating and documenting intellectual property transactions, including product development projects and intellectual property purchases, sales and licensing.

Neal also prepares and prosecutes patent applications in a wide variety of technologies including medical devices, complex mechanical systems, optical technologies, sporting goods, electrical components, lighting components, and others.  He has also prosecuted patent appeals before the Patent Board of Appeals and Interferences.

Neal maintains an active trademark practice, prosecuting trademark applications and handling inter partes proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.  He maintains the international trademark portfolios of numerous clients engaged in global commerce.

Areas of Expertise

Legal Practices

Leader for:

Member of:

Intellectual Property

Industry Teams

Leader for:

Member of:

Industrial and Consumer Manufacturing
Gaming, Hospitality and Retail

Focuses

Please select listing to show.

Admissions

District of ColumbiaNew YorkPennsylvaniaU.S. Court of Appeals, Federal CircuitU.S. Court of Appeals, Second CircuitU.S. District Court, Illinois – Central DistrictU.S. District Court, Michigan - Eastern DistrictU.S. District Court, Michigan - Western DistrictU.S. District Court, New York - Eastern DistrictU.S. District Court, New York - Northern DistrictU.S. District Court, New York - Southern DistrictU.S. District Court, New York - Western DistrictU.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Representative Matters

  • Greatbatch Ltd. v. AVX Corp. et al. (U.S. District Court, D. Del. 2019): Represented patent owner in patent infringement action over key components for pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Jury verdicts found infringement of three U.S. Patents, and awarded lost profits and price erosion. Judgment on the jury verdict exceeded $27 million in damages.
  • Izzo Golf, Inc. v. King Par Golf, Inc. (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2010): Plaintiff’s counsel in a patent infringement action resulting in a jury verdict and finding of willful infringement ultimately totaling approximately $12 million.
  • Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Conan 716, Inc. (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2022): Represented Broadcast Music, Inc. in copyright infringement litigation.
  • Broadcast Music, Inc. v. ROKDOK LLC (U.S District Court, N.D.N.Y, 2019): Represented Broadcast Music, Inc. in copyright infringement litigation.
  • Jaccard Corp. v. Keystone Mfg. (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2008): Counsel for plaintiff in jury trial resulting in successful prosecution of trade dress infringement claim.
  • John King Chains Limited v. John King USA, Inc. (U.S. District Court, C.D. Ill., 2017): Represented a United Kingdom company in a trademark dispute, in the Central District of Illinois, with the company’s former U.S. affiliate, resulting in the affiliate agreeing to cease using the disputed trademarks.
  • Eastman Kodak v. Sun Microsystems (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2002): Co-counsel for Kodak in patent infringement claim involving Java Run Time and Java Virtual Machine.
  • Eastman Kodak v. Sony Corp. (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2004): Co-counsel for Kodak in patent infringement claim involving digital imaging.
  • Amesbury Products v. Caldwell Manufacturing (U.S. District Court, D. Mass., 2008): Defense counsel in a patent infringement suit involving patents for window balances.
  • Frink America v. Champion Road Machinery Ltd. (U.S. District Court, N.D.N.Y., 1996): Plaintiff’s jury verdict for $5.3 million in an action for misappropriation of intellectual property.
  • Redcom Laboratories v. Cisco Systems (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2000): Plaintiff’s counsel in multimillion dollar settlement of patent infringement claim involving telephone switching equipment.
  • Laser Diode Array, Inc. v. Paradigm Lasers (U.S. District Court, N.D.N.Y., 1996): Representation of Paradigm through a successful Markman hearing resulting in voluntary dismissal of action.
  • Bevin Barber v. Terry Precision (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2001): Counsel for Terry Precision in trademark infringement action.
  • Ltg. Ltd. v. MaxLite-S.K. America (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board): Representation of MaxLite in trademark opposition action.
  • Faster Form v. Portney (U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y., 2003): Representation of Faster Form in trade dress infringement action.
  • Broadcast Music Inc. v. Millennium Billiards (U.S. District Court, W.D.N.Y., 2002): Representation of Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI) in copyright infringement action.

Distinctions

Professional and Civic

  • International Trademark Association, Leadership Committee
  • Rochester Regional Photonics Cluster, board member
  • Young Entrepreneurs Academy, mentor

Recognition

  • Super Lawyers, Intellectual Property and Intellectual Property Litigation, 2011-2021 and since 2024
  • Best Lawyers, Copyright Law, since 2018
  • Best Lawyers, Litigation – Patent, since 2013
  • Best Lawyers, Litigation – Intellectual Property, since 2018
  • Best Lawyers, Patent Law, since 2020
  • Best Lawyers, Trademark Law, since 2020
  • Best Lawyers, Lawyer of the Year, Litigation – Patent, 2020, 2024, 2026
  • Best Lawyers, Lawyer of the Year, Litigation – Intellectual Property, 2021, 2024
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of October 13, 2026 2:09 am