skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
In The News
October 31, 2021

State Supreme Court in Suffolk County Dismisses Liability Case Against Atria Senior Living

Authors and Contacts

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

This matter concerns a lawsuit brought by the estate of former Atria East Northport resident, Patricia Desjardins, against Barbara Friedrich, a motorist who struck Ms. Desjardins while she was crossing the street in front of the community.  Ms. Friedrich in turn sued Atria Senior Living in a third-party action, alleging if she is held liable it is due to the negligence of Atria. 

In finding for Atria, the State Supreme Court in Suffolk County held that “Atria established as a matter of law that it owed no duty to plaintiff to prevent her from leaving its facility, and, thus, had no liability to plaintiff.” Specifically, Atria lacked the necessary authority or ability to exercise control over the plaintiff, so as to create a duty on its part since (1) the plaintiff was a voluntary resident of Atria with no medical reason to impede her ability to leave the facility unaccompanied; and (2) statutes and regulations provide for the right of a voluntary resident in non-emergency situations to make independent personal decisions, to exercise civil liberties, and to be free of physical restraints. see Malave v. Lakeside Manor Homes for Adults, Inc., 105 AD3d 914 (2d Dep’t 2013).

Significantly, the Court found that Atria, as an adult home, lacked “a certain level of authority and control” over its residents. Fox v. Marshall, 88 AD3d 131 (2d Dep’t 2011), who did not “relinquish general autonomy”. Purdy v. Public Adm’r of County of Westchester, 72 NY2d 1 (1988).

Related Legal Practices

Medical and Life Sciences
Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

News

State Supreme Court in Suffolk County Dismisses Liability Case Against Atria Senior Living

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
In The News
October 31, 2021

State Supreme Court in Suffolk County Dismisses Liability Case Against Atria Senior Living

News

This matter concerns a lawsuit brought by the estate of former Atria East Northport resident, Patricia Desjardins, against Barbara Friedrich, a motorist who struck Ms. Desjardins while she was crossing the street in front of the community.  Ms. Friedrich in turn sued Atria Senior Living in a third-party action, alleging if she is held liable it is due to the negligence of Atria. 

In finding for Atria, the State Supreme Court in Suffolk County held that “Atria established as a matter of law that it owed no duty to plaintiff to prevent her from leaving its facility, and, thus, had no liability to plaintiff.” Specifically, Atria lacked the necessary authority or ability to exercise control over the plaintiff, so as to create a duty on its part since (1) the plaintiff was a voluntary resident of Atria with no medical reason to impede her ability to leave the facility unaccompanied; and (2) statutes and regulations provide for the right of a voluntary resident in non-emergency situations to make independent personal decisions, to exercise civil liberties, and to be free of physical restraints. see Malave v. Lakeside Manor Homes for Adults, Inc., 105 AD3d 914 (2d Dep’t 2013).

Significantly, the Court found that Atria, as an adult home, lacked “a certain level of authority and control” over its residents. Fox v. Marshall, 88 AD3d 131 (2d Dep’t 2011), who did not “relinquish general autonomy”. Purdy v. Public Adm’r of County of Westchester, 72 NY2d 1 (1988).

Authors

Amy Abbink

Paralegal
(585) 419 -8744
aabbink@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Ercilia Gonzalez Acevedo

Paralegal
(518) 701-2771
egonzalez@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Mary M. Ackerly

Senior Counsel
(860) 600-2522
mackerly@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Gina Adams

Paralegal
(585) 419-8745
gadams@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Javid Afzali

Member
(518) 701-2775
jafzali@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Azin Ahmadi

Senior Counsel
(518) 701-2767
aahmadi@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Selma Al Taii

Associate
(585) 419-8793
saltaii@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Jordan C. Alaimo

Member
(585) 419-8855
jalaimo@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Ian Altman

Chief Financial Officer
(860) 240-6132
ialtman@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Gabriella S. Amato

Associate
(516) 880-8379
gamato@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 15, 2026 7:49 am