skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
In The News
March 2, 2026

Attorneys Highlight Another Try by Auto Manufacturers to Bypass Dealers

Authors and Contacts

Thomas S. Vangel

Lindsey M. McComber

James F. Radke

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Three attorneys from in Harris Beach Murtha’s Automotive and Vehicle Dealerships Industry Team have again tackled the subject of electric vehicle manufacturers attempting to bypassing dealerships and sell directly to consumers in a column for the Massachusetts State Auto Dealers Association.

The latest column discusses at attempt by Lucid Group USA to sell directly to consumers in Georgia. Lucid is a California-based luxury electric vehicle manufacturer.

Attorneys Thomas S. Vangel, Lindsey M. McComber and James F. Radke previously covered an attempt by Scout Motors to sell directly to Colorado consumers. In that column for the same publication, they mentioned these types of attempts were taking place across the nation and they’d continue to report on them.

In their latest column on Lucid, the three attorneys noted the Georgia Supreme Court reversed and vacated a trial court’s dismissal of Lucid’s claim that a Georgia law banning direct sales to consumers violated due process and equal protection clauses in the Georgia Consititution, among other things.

Lucid had submitted an application for a dealership license to the Georgia Department of Revenue. The Department of Revenue denied the application based on the state’s Direct Sales Prohibition.

“The law requires manufacturers to sell their new motor vehicles through a new motor vehicle dealer, and it generally prohibits manufacturers and their affiliated entities from owning or operating a new motor vehicle dealer,” the attorneys wrote. “These sections together encompass what is known as the “Direct Sales Prohibition” and prevent new motor vehicle manufacturers and their affiliates from selling their vehicles directly to consumers in Georgia.”

Lucid sued, saying the Direct Sales Prohibition violates several provisions of the Georgia Constitution, including the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause, as well as two other provisions. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit, holding the state’s constitution authorized the state to regulate members of the new motor vehicle industry.

On appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court held the trial court improperly dismissed Lucid’s case, finding, among other things, the language of the constitution allowed the General Assembly to regulate the new motor vehicle industry only when acting to prevent fraud and unfair business practices upon its citizens.

“Although this decision may seem like a win for Lucid, it does not legalize direct sales in Georgia, and Lucid will still have to prove that Georgia’s direct sales ban under the Motor Vehicle Franchise Practices Act does not prevent “frauds, unfair business practices, unfair methods of competition, impositions, and other abuses upon its citizens,” the attorneys wrote.

Read the complete column.

Authors and Contacts

Attorney Lindsey M. McComber

Lindsey M. McComber

Associate

Partner James F. Radke

James F. Radke

Member

Partner Thomas S. Vangel

Thomas S. Vangel

Member

Related Industries

Automotive and Vehicle Dealerships
Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

News

Attorneys Highlight Another Try by Auto Manufacturers to Bypass Dealers

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
In The News
March 2, 2026

Attorneys Highlight Another Try by Auto Manufacturers to Bypass Dealers

News

Three attorneys from in Harris Beach Murtha’s Automotive and Vehicle Dealerships Industry Team have again tackled the subject of electric vehicle manufacturers attempting to bypassing dealerships and sell directly to consumers in a column for the Massachusetts State Auto Dealers Association.

The latest column discusses at attempt by Lucid Group USA to sell directly to consumers in Georgia. Lucid is a California-based luxury electric vehicle manufacturer.

Attorneys Thomas S. Vangel, Lindsey M. McComber and James F. Radke previously covered an attempt by Scout Motors to sell directly to Colorado consumers. In that column for the same publication, they mentioned these types of attempts were taking place across the nation and they’d continue to report on them.

In their latest column on Lucid, the three attorneys noted the Georgia Supreme Court reversed and vacated a trial court’s dismissal of Lucid’s claim that a Georgia law banning direct sales to consumers violated due process and equal protection clauses in the Georgia Consititution, among other things.

Lucid had submitted an application for a dealership license to the Georgia Department of Revenue. The Department of Revenue denied the application based on the state's Direct Sales Prohibition.

“The law requires manufacturers to sell their new motor vehicles through a new motor vehicle dealer, and it generally prohibits manufacturers and their affiliated entities from owning or operating a new motor vehicle dealer,” the attorneys wrote. “These sections together encompass what is known as the “Direct Sales Prohibition” and prevent new motor vehicle manufacturers and their affiliates from selling their vehicles directly to consumers in Georgia.”

Lucid sued, saying the Direct Sales Prohibition violates several provisions of the Georgia Constitution, including the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause, as well as two other provisions. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit, holding the state’s constitution authorized the state to regulate members of the new motor vehicle industry.

On appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court held the trial court improperly dismissed Lucid’s case, finding, among other things, the language of the constitution allowed the General Assembly to regulate the new motor vehicle industry only when acting to prevent fraud and unfair business practices upon its citizens.

“Although this decision may seem like a win for Lucid, it does not legalize direct sales in Georgia, and Lucid will still have to prove that Georgia’s direct sales ban under the Motor Vehicle Franchise Practices Act does not prevent “frauds, unfair business practices, unfair methods of competition, impositions, and other abuses upon its citizens,” the attorneys wrote.

Read the complete column.

Authors

Lindsey M. McComber

Associate
(617) 457-4065
lmccomber@harrisbeachmurtha.com

James F. Radke

Member
(617) 457-4130
jradke@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Thomas S. Vangel

Member
(617) 457-4072
tvangel@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 8, 2026 12:17 am