skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
Legal Alert
March 1, 2021

United States District Court Finds CDC Order Exceeds Constitutional Power Granted to Federal Government

Authors and Contacts

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

In a February 25, 2021 decision, U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker found that the nationwide eviction moratorium issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) exceeds the scope of its constitutional power.  That power is found in Article I (Section 8, Clause 3) of the United States Constitution, commonly known as the Commerce Clause, which grants the federal government the authority to regulate commerce “among the several States.”

The Court arrived at this conclusion because the CDC order does not limit its application based on a connection to interstate commerce. Judge Barker found that “[t]he fact that an activity has some ultimate tie or correlation to national-employment or socio-economic statistics, as noted in the administrative record here, is not enough of a nexus under the constitutional test.” Additionally, the Court found that the CDC’s efforts to regulate private property rights, for which it lacks constitutional authority, was deemed to tread into an area of traditional State concern. As such, the challenged CDC moratorium was held unlawful order as it exceeds the power granted to the federal government under the Commerce Clause to regulate commerce among the States.

Judge Barker also pointed out – and the government admitted – that “the federal government has never before invoked its commerce power to impose a nationwide eviction moratorium.”  Nor was any precedential example of a longstanding analogous use of federal power presented as a basis to uphold the CDC order in dispute.

In its decision, the Court merely declared the scope of constitutional power and stopped short of issuing an injunction, in light of the CDC’s representations to the court that it would respect the declaratory judgment.  Although this remains an option, should it become necessary. As does an appeal of this Order by the federal government.

Of course, irrespective of the enforceability of the CDC order, New York state evictions remain subject to various restrictions and stays of enforcement, including a pause on residential evictions which technically expired February 26, 2021, after which a tenant simply needs to submit a standardized hardship declaration form in order to extend the eviction ban through May 1, 2021.

Meanwhile, Governor Cuomo’s most recent Executive Order 202.92, which continued all directives made by the repeatedly extended initial Executive Order 202 of March 7, 2020, and includes a moratorium on initiating a proceeding or enforcement of an eviction of any commercial tenant for nonpayment of rent, also expired February 26, 2021.  However, the Governor indicated a desire to continue the prohibition of commercial evictions through May 1, 2021 in his State of the State address. Additionally, NYS Senate Bill S471A, which would prevent commercial evictions through May 1, 2021 for nonpayment of rent, or for holding over after the expiration of a lease – also upon the mere submission of a standardized hardship declaration form – has passed both houses of the legislature and awaits the Governor’s signature.

This constantly shifting landscape continues to transform the way landlords must deal with defaulting tenants.  Each situation is unique and landlords are advised to consult with a knowledgeable attorney, capable of navigating these complex and evolving enforcement requirements and to discuss options and resources that can be utilized to assist in recovering possession of their property and collecting past due rent. Please contact the Harris Beach attorney you typically work with for support.

This alert does not purport to be a substitute for advice of counsel on specific matters.

Harris Beach has offices throughout New York State, including Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, Long Island, New York City, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse and White Plains, as well as New Haven, Connecticut and Newark, New Jersey.

Related Legal Practices

Commercial Real Estate
Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

Insights

United States District Court Finds CDC Order Exceeds Constitutional Power Granted to Federal Government

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Legal Alert
March 1, 2021

United States District Court Finds CDC Order Exceeds Constitutional Power Granted to Federal Government

Insight

In a February 25, 2021 decision, U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker found that the nationwide eviction moratorium issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) exceeds the scope of its constitutional power.  That power is found in Article I (Section 8, Clause 3) of the United States Constitution, commonly known as the Commerce Clause, which grants the federal government the authority to regulate commerce “among the several States.”

The Court arrived at this conclusion because the CDC order does not limit its application based on a connection to interstate commerce. Judge Barker found that “[t]he fact that an activity has some ultimate tie or correlation to national-employment or socio-economic statistics, as noted in the administrative record here, is not enough of a nexus under the constitutional test.” Additionally, the Court found that the CDC’s efforts to regulate private property rights, for which it lacks constitutional authority, was deemed to tread into an area of traditional State concern. As such, the challenged CDC moratorium was held unlawful order as it exceeds the power granted to the federal government under the Commerce Clause to regulate commerce among the States.

Judge Barker also pointed out – and the government admitted – that “the federal government has never before invoked its commerce power to impose a nationwide eviction moratorium.”  Nor was any precedential example of a longstanding analogous use of federal power presented as a basis to uphold the CDC order in dispute.

In its decision, the Court merely declared the scope of constitutional power and stopped short of issuing an injunction, in light of the CDC’s representations to the court that it would respect the declaratory judgment.  Although this remains an option, should it become necessary. As does an appeal of this Order by the federal government.

Of course, irrespective of the enforceability of the CDC order, New York state evictions remain subject to various restrictions and stays of enforcement, including a pause on residential evictions which technically expired February 26, 2021, after which a tenant simply needs to submit a standardized hardship declaration form in order to extend the eviction ban through May 1, 2021.

Meanwhile, Governor Cuomo’s most recent Executive Order 202.92, which continued all directives made by the repeatedly extended initial Executive Order 202 of March 7, 2020, and includes a moratorium on initiating a proceeding or enforcement of an eviction of any commercial tenant for nonpayment of rent, also expired February 26, 2021.  However, the Governor indicated a desire to continue the prohibition of commercial evictions through May 1, 2021 in his State of the State address. Additionally, NYS Senate Bill S471A, which would prevent commercial evictions through May 1, 2021 for nonpayment of rent, or for holding over after the expiration of a lease – also upon the mere submission of a standardized hardship declaration form – has passed both houses of the legislature and awaits the Governor’s signature.

This constantly shifting landscape continues to transform the way landlords must deal with defaulting tenants.  Each situation is unique and landlords are advised to consult with a knowledgeable attorney, capable of navigating these complex and evolving enforcement requirements and to discuss options and resources that can be utilized to assist in recovering possession of their property and collecting past due rent. Please contact the Harris Beach attorney you typically work with for support.

This alert does not purport to be a substitute for advice of counsel on specific matters.

Harris Beach has offices throughout New York State, including Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, Long Island, New York City, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse and White Plains, as well as New Haven, Connecticut and Newark, New Jersey.

Authors

Amy Abbink

Paralegal
(585) 419 -8744
aabbink@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Ercilia Gonzalez Acevedo

Paralegal
(518) 701-2771
egonzalez@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Mary M. Ackerly

Senior Counsel
(860) 600-2522
mackerly@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Gina Adams

Paralegal
(585) 419-8745
gadams@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Javid Afzali

Member
(518) 701-2775
jafzali@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Azin Ahmadi

Senior Counsel
(518) 701-2767
aahmadi@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Selma Al Taii

Associate
(585) 419-8793
saltaii@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Jordan C. Alaimo

Member
(585) 419-8855
jalaimo@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Ian Altman

Chief Financial Officer
(860) 240-6132
ialtman@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Gabriella S. Amato

Associate
(516) 880-8379
gamato@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 7, 2026 11:20 pm