skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
Advisory
May 25, 2022

Seeking Clarity in Blue Sky Laws: Exclusions from Municipal Issuer Exemptions

Authors and Contacts

Christopher A. Andreucci

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

We continue our series exploring the lack of uniformity – and sometimes lack of guidance – that makes it challenging to interpret state Blue Sky laws. Today’s example addresses the exclusion from the use of the municipal issuer exemption if the securities being issued a paid from a non-governmental source.

Summary:

Some states exclude from the municipal exemption the registration of municipal securities that are paid from a non-governmental industrial or commercial enterprise, unless the payments are insured or guaranteed by a person whose securities are exempt from registration under certain other enumerated sections of the law.

Issue:

There is substantial disagreement among these states as to whether conduit 501(c)(3) bonds, student loan bonds and single family mortgage revenue bonds constitute bonds payable from revenues to be received from a non-governmental industrial or commercial enterprise.

Sub-Issue:

Assuming you have determined that the municipal securities being issued will be paid from a non-governmental industrial or commercial enterprise, does the “separate security” analysis apply?  Does the state in question include within the definition of exempt securities any “separate security” as defined in Rule 131 (17 C.F.R. 230.131) adopted under the Securities Act of 1933?  If yes, then you can proceed without any further action but if no, one must consider:

  • Is it a federal covered security, and if so, does that state require a notice filing for such a security instead of a full-blown registration?
  • Is the state in question one that only prohibits the use of the municipal exemption for securities that are paid from a non-governmental industrial or commercial enterprise to IN-STATE issuers only?
  • Is the state in question one that allows for the use of the municipal exemption if the securities being offered obtain a rating high enough so as to not require any registration or notice filing?

Bottom line:

State opinions can sharply differ regarding exclusions from municipal bond exemptions. With the lack of guidance and uniformity, can make practicing in this area confusing which is why it’s key to rely on experienced consultants.

If you have any questions about Blue Sky Laws or Blue Sky Surveys, please contact Chris Andreucci at 585-419-8606 or candreucci@harrisbeachmurtha.com.

Authors and Contacts

Christopher Andreucci

Christopher A. Andreucci

Member

Related Legal Practices

Public Finance and Economic Development

Related Focuses

Blue Sky Surveys for Municipal Bond Financings
Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

Insights

Seeking Clarity in Blue Sky Laws: Exclusions from Municipal Issuer Exemptions

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Advisory
May 25, 2022

Seeking Clarity in Blue Sky Laws: Exclusions from Municipal Issuer Exemptions

Insight

We continue our series exploring the lack of uniformity – and sometimes lack of guidance – that makes it challenging to interpret state Blue Sky laws. Today’s example addresses the exclusion from the use of the municipal issuer exemption if the securities being issued a paid from a non-governmental source.

Summary:

Some states exclude from the municipal exemption the registration of municipal securities that are paid from a non-governmental industrial or commercial enterprise, unless the payments are insured or guaranteed by a person whose securities are exempt from registration under certain other enumerated sections of the law.

Issue:

There is substantial disagreement among these states as to whether conduit 501(c)(3) bonds, student loan bonds and single family mortgage revenue bonds constitute bonds payable from revenues to be received from a non-governmental industrial or commercial enterprise.

Sub-Issue:

Assuming you have determined that the municipal securities being issued will be paid from a non-governmental industrial or commercial enterprise, does the “separate security” analysis apply?  Does the state in question include within the definition of exempt securities any “separate security” as defined in Rule 131 (17 C.F.R. 230.131) adopted under the Securities Act of 1933?  If yes, then you can proceed without any further action but if no, one must consider:

  • Is it a federal covered security, and if so, does that state require a notice filing for such a security instead of a full-blown registration?
  • Is the state in question one that only prohibits the use of the municipal exemption for securities that are paid from a non-governmental industrial or commercial enterprise to IN-STATE issuers only?
  • Is the state in question one that allows for the use of the municipal exemption if the securities being offered obtain a rating high enough so as to not require any registration or notice filing?

Bottom line:

State opinions can sharply differ regarding exclusions from municipal bond exemptions. With the lack of guidance and uniformity, can make practicing in this area confusing which is why it’s key to rely on experienced consultants.

If you have any questions about Blue Sky Laws or Blue Sky Surveys, please contact Chris Andreucci at 585-419-8606 or candreucci@harrisbeachmurtha.com.

Authors

Christopher A. Andreucci

Member
(585) 419-8606
candreucci@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 15, 2026 9:11 am