skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
Employment Law Perspectives Blog, New York Employment Attorney Blog
June 23, 2026

DOL Issues Opinion on Exempt Employees Working Secondary Nonexempt Roles

Authors and Contacts

Salvatore G. Gangemi

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently issued four opinion letters in response to public inquiries regarding specific applications of the Fair Labor Standards Act and DOL regulations. Over the next several days, we will address each of these opinion letters, with the one discussed below being of particular interest to hospitals and health care providers facing staffing shortages.

Exempt Employees Working in Nonexempt Roles

On May 28, 2026, the DOL issued an opinion, FLSA 2026-5, addressing whether a white-collar exempt employee could perform additional work in a secondary, nonexempt role at an hourly rate, the extent to which such work would affect an employee’s exempt status, and its effect on overtime obligations. Although the opinion letter applies to all industries, it was requested by a hospital.

According to the opinion letter, the hospital employed staff in “Staff Nurse” and “Nursing Professional Development Specialist (Specialist)” positions. The Staff Nurse position was classified as a nonexempt position, and entailed “formulating clinical decisions . . . utilizing a multi-dimensional plan of case with the nursing process, demonstrating respect for patient rights and privacy, serving as an advocate, assisting in orientation of new employees, and delegating tasks to other personnel.”

The Specialist’s functions included “identifying gaps in learning opportunities, designing educational programs, onboarding new staff, advancing the professional development of all staff, and conducting ongoing competency processes.” Although the Specialist does not replace the Staff Nurse and that position’s function, the Specialist might perform the same interventions as a Staff Nurse. Specialists are classified as exempt.

On occasion, Specialists pick up Staff Nurse shifts as additional work. According to the opinion letter, Specialists typically pick up one or two 12-hour Staff Nurse shifts on weekends, after working 40 hours from Monday through Friday. As a result, Specialists who work weekend hours performing nonexempt work are working well in excess of 40 hours in a workweek, across a combination of exempt and nonexempt positions. These extra shifts account for about 23 percent to 38 percent of a Specialist’s weekly worked hours.

DOL Opinion Eases Health Care Employers’ Staffing Shortage Concerns

The DOL concluded that, under these circumstances, Specialists do not lose their exempt status simply because they perform additional hourly nonexempt work for the same employer. As a result, working in excess of 40 hours does not trigger any obligation to pay the Specialist overtime pay.

According to the DOL, the above result is permissible because:

  • the Specialist’s primary duty remains performing exempt work;

  • the Specialist’s salary is not impacted by the extra hourly work, and satisfies the salary basis test; and

  • paying extra hourly wages for other work does not violate the salary basis test, because DOL regulations allow extra compensation in addition to salary.

Bottom line

Allowing an exempt employee to assume other roles or positions will not jeopardize the employee’s exempt status as long as the employee’s primary work remains exempt and the employee’s salary is not affected. There are risks in permitting this arrangement if scheduling or other health care practices shift exempt employees’ work to performing more hourly work.

The DOL’s opinion letter clarifies an important operational issue affecting the health care industry and other industries that require staffing flexibility.

Harris Beach Murtha’s Labor and Employment Practice Group attorneys are closely following DOL activities and related matters. If you have questions or need assistance with the DOL’s opinion letter and its application to your practices, please reach out to attorney Salvatore G. Gangemi at (203) 653-5436 and sgangemi@harrisbeachmurtha.com, or the Harris Beach Murtha attorney with whom you most frequently work.

This alert is not a substitute for advice of counsel on specific legal issues.

Harris Beach Murtha’s lawyers and consultants practice from offices throughout Connecticut in Bantam, Hartford, New Haven and Stamford; New York State in Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Niagara Falls, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Long Island and White Plains; as well as in Boston, Massachusetts, and Newark, New Jersey.

Authors and Contacts

Partner Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi

Member

Related Legal Practices

Labor and Employment

Related Industries

Health Care
Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

Insights

DOL Issues Opinion on Exempt Employees Working Secondary Nonexempt Roles

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Employment Law Perspectives Blog, New York Employment Attorney Blog
June 23, 2026

DOL Issues Opinion on Exempt Employees Working Secondary Nonexempt Roles

Insight

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently issued four opinion letters in response to public inquiries regarding specific applications of the Fair Labor Standards Act and DOL regulations. Over the next several days, we will address each of these opinion letters, with the one discussed below being of particular interest to hospitals and health care providers facing staffing shortages.

Exempt Employees Working in Nonexempt Roles

On May 28, 2026, the DOL issued an opinion, FLSA 2026-5, addressing whether a white-collar exempt employee could perform additional work in a secondary, nonexempt role at an hourly rate, the extent to which such work would affect an employee’s exempt status, and its effect on overtime obligations. Although the opinion letter applies to all industries, it was requested by a hospital.

According to the opinion letter, the hospital employed staff in “Staff Nurse” and “Nursing Professional Development Specialist (Specialist)" positions. The Staff Nurse position was classified as a nonexempt position, and entailed “formulating clinical decisions . . . utilizing a multi-dimensional plan of case with the nursing process, demonstrating respect for patient rights and privacy, serving as an advocate, assisting in orientation of new employees, and delegating tasks to other personnel.”

The Specialist’s functions included "identifying gaps in learning opportunities, designing educational programs, onboarding new staff, advancing the professional development of all staff, and conducting ongoing competency processes.” Although the Specialist does not replace the Staff Nurse and that position’s function, the Specialist might perform the same interventions as a Staff Nurse. Specialists are classified as exempt.

On occasion, Specialists pick up Staff Nurse shifts as additional work. According to the opinion letter, Specialists typically pick up one or two 12-hour Staff Nurse shifts on weekends, after working 40 hours from Monday through Friday. As a result, Specialists who work weekend hours performing nonexempt work are working well in excess of 40 hours in a workweek, across a combination of exempt and nonexempt positions. These extra shifts account for about 23 percent to 38 percent of a Specialist’s weekly worked hours.

DOL Opinion Eases Health Care Employers' Staffing Shortage Concerns

The DOL concluded that, under these circumstances, Specialists do not lose their exempt status simply because they perform additional hourly nonexempt work for the same employer. As a result, working in excess of 40 hours does not trigger any obligation to pay the Specialist overtime pay.

According to the DOL, the above result is permissible because:

  • the Specialist’s primary duty remains performing exempt work;

  • the Specialist’s salary is not impacted by the extra hourly work, and satisfies the salary basis test; and

  • paying extra hourly wages for other work does not violate the salary basis test, because DOL regulations allow extra compensation in addition to salary.

Bottom line

Allowing an exempt employee to assume other roles or positions will not jeopardize the employee’s exempt status as long as the employee's primary work remains exempt and the employee's salary is not affected. There are risks in permitting this arrangement if scheduling or other health care practices shift exempt employees’ work to performing more hourly work.

The DOL’s opinion letter clarifies an important operational issue affecting the health care industry and other industries that require staffing flexibility.

Harris Beach Murtha’s Labor and Employment Practice Group attorneys are closely following DOL activities and related matters. If you have questions or need assistance with the DOL’s opinion letter and its application to your practices, please reach out to attorney Salvatore G. Gangemi at (203) 653-5436 and sgangemi@harrisbeachmurtha.com, or the Harris Beach Murtha attorney with whom you most frequently work.

This alert is not a substitute for advice of counsel on specific legal issues.

Harris Beach Murtha’s lawyers and consultants practice from offices throughout Connecticut in Bantam, Hartford, New Haven and Stamford; New York State in Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Niagara Falls, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Long Island and White Plains; as well as in Boston, Massachusetts, and Newark, New Jersey.

Authors

Salvatore G. Gangemi

Member
(203) 653-5436; (212) 425-0630
sgangemi@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 15, 2026 8:06 am