skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
Legal Alert
January 23, 2026

Court Holds NY IDAs May Finance Affordable Senior Housing Projects

Authors and Contacts

Michael A. Discenza

Elizabeth C. Hughes

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

A recent decision by the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division – Second Department has cleared the way for industrial development agencies (IDAs) to provide financial assistance to affordable senior housing projects.

The Jan. 21, 2026, ruling in Wyandanch Union Free School District et. al. v Town of Babylon comes in response to a challenge by the Wyandanch Union Free School District (“Petitioners”) against the Babylon Industrial Development Agency’s provision of financial assistance, including a partial abatement from real property taxes, a mortgage recording tax exemption and a sales and use tax exemption, to a senior housing project in the hamlet of Wyandanch (the Town).

IDAs were created under Article 18-a of the General Municipal Law (the “Act”) to “advance the job opportunities, health, general prosperity and economic welfare of the people of the state of New York and to improve their recreation opportunities, prosperity and standard of living” by providing financial assistance to eligible “projects” in the municipality the IDA was created to benefit.

The Petitioners argued the senior housing facility did not constitute a “project” under General Municipal Law Article 18-a (the “Act”). The Court disagreed, noting the Babylon IDA specifically found that the “proposed construction will promote employment opportunities and combat economic deterioration” especially in light of the fact that the Town was in need of affordable senior housing, and the senior housing project was part of a larger project aimed at an urban renewable area in the Town and involved an economically distressed area.

Although the Act enumerates a list of activities that are “projects” that does not include residential projects, the court notes this list is non-exhaustive, given the plain text of the statute. Rather, the primary consideration when determining whether the proposed project is a “project” within the meaning of the Act is whether it “promotes employment opportunities and prevents economic deterioration” to support the legislative purpose of the Act.

Our Affordable Housing Industry Team and Public Finance and Economic Development Group will continue to track developments such as this to keep clients informed. If you have questions about this or related development or affordable housing matters, please reach out to attorney Michael A. Discenza at (212) 912-3605 and mdiscenza@harrisbeachmurtha.com; attorney Elizabeth C. Hughes at (716) 200-5269 and ehughes@harrisbeachmurtha.com; or the Harris Beach Murtha attorney with whom you most frequently work.

This alert is not a substitute for advice of counsel on specific legal issues.

Harris Beach Murtha’s lawyers and consultants practice from offices throughout Connecticut in Bantam, Hartford, New Haven and Stamford; New York state in Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Niagara Falls, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Long Island and White Plains, as well as in Boston, Massachusetts, Newark, New Jersey and Washington, D.C.

Authors and Contacts

Michael-Discenza

Michael A. Discenza

Member
Elizabeth Hughes

Elizabeth C. Hughes

Associate

Related Legal Practices

Commercial Real Estate
Public Finance and Economic Development

Related Industries

Affordable Housing
Real Estate Developers
Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

Insights

Court Holds NY IDAs May Finance Affordable Senior Housing Projects

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Legal Alert
January 23, 2026

Court Holds NY IDAs May Finance Affordable Senior Housing Projects

Insight

A recent decision by the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division - Second Department has cleared the way for industrial development agencies (IDAs) to provide financial assistance to affordable senior housing projects.

The Jan. 21, 2026, ruling in Wyandanch Union Free School District et. al. v Town of Babylon comes in response to a challenge by the Wyandanch Union Free School District (“Petitioners”) against the Babylon Industrial Development Agency’s provision of financial assistance, including a partial abatement from real property taxes, a mortgage recording tax exemption and a sales and use tax exemption, to a senior housing project in the hamlet of Wyandanch (the Town).

IDAs were created under Article 18-a of the General Municipal Law (the “Act”) to “advance the job opportunities, health, general prosperity and economic welfare of the people of the state of New York and to improve their recreation opportunities, prosperity and standard of living” by providing financial assistance to eligible “projects” in the municipality the IDA was created to benefit.

The Petitioners argued the senior housing facility did not constitute a “project” under General Municipal Law Article 18-a (the “Act”). The Court disagreed, noting the Babylon IDA specifically found that the “proposed construction will promote employment opportunities and combat economic deterioration” especially in light of the fact that the Town was in need of affordable senior housing, and the senior housing project was part of a larger project aimed at an urban renewable area in the Town and involved an economically distressed area.

Although the Act enumerates a list of activities that are “projects” that does not include residential projects, the court notes this list is non-exhaustive, given the plain text of the statute. Rather, the primary consideration when determining whether the proposed project is a “project” within the meaning of the Act is whether it “promotes employment opportunities and prevents economic deterioration” to support the legislative purpose of the Act.

Our Affordable Housing Industry Team and Public Finance and Economic Development Group will continue to track developments such as this to keep clients informed. If you have questions about this or related development or affordable housing matters, please reach out to attorney Michael A. Discenza at (212) 912-3605 and mdiscenza@harrisbeachmurtha.com; attorney Elizabeth C. Hughes at (716) 200-5269 and ehughes@harrisbeachmurtha.com; or the Harris Beach Murtha attorney with whom you most frequently work.

This alert is not a substitute for advice of counsel on specific legal issues.

Harris Beach Murtha’s lawyers and consultants practice from offices throughout Connecticut in Bantam, Hartford, New Haven and Stamford; New York state in Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Niagara Falls, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Long Island and White Plains, as well as in Boston, Massachusetts, Newark, New Jersey and Washington, D.C.

Authors

Michael A. Discenza

Member
(212) 912-3605
mdiscenza@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Elizabeth C. Hughes

Associate
(716) 200-5269
ehughes@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 15, 2026 7:32 am