skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
Employment Law Perspectives Blog
March 12, 2021

Connecticut Prohibits Hair Discrimination

Authors and Contacts

Patricia E. Reilly

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

On March 4, 2021, Governor Lamont signed into law the CROWN Act, which stands for Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural hair. Connecticut follows California, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Colorado, Washington, and Virginia in adopting legislation that aims to prohibit discrimination on the basis of ethnic hairstyles historically associated with race.

The CROWN Act expands the definition of “race” under Connecticut’s Human Rights and Opportunities statute (General Statutes § 46a-51, et. seq.) to include traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles, such as braids, locs and twists.  For employers, this means that it is illegal to discriminate against applicants or employees because they maintain their natural hair or hairstyles that are closely associated with their racial identity.  Although hair texture and protective hairstyles are specifically mentioned, other traits historically associated with race may also be afforded protection under the statute.

Employers are encouraged to review their grooming policies and eliminate any provisions that may violate the CROWN Act.  This may include policies that require employees to adopt a certain hairstyle; prohibit employees from wearing certain hairstyles; or indicate a preference for certain hairstyles over others.  Employers are also encouraged to train their employees, especially managers or supervisors, to recognize and detect bias on the basis of traits historically associated with race.

Authors and Contacts

Partner Patricia E. Reilly

Patricia E. Reilly

Member

Related Legal Practices

Labor and Employment
Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

Insights

Connecticut Prohibits Hair Discrimination

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Employment Law Perspectives Blog
March 12, 2021

Connecticut Prohibits Hair Discrimination

Insight

On March 4, 2021, Governor Lamont signed into law the CROWN Act, which stands for Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural hair. Connecticut follows California, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Colorado, Washington, and Virginia in adopting legislation that aims to prohibit discrimination on the basis of ethnic hairstyles historically associated with race.

The CROWN Act expands the definition of “race” under Connecticut’s Human Rights and Opportunities statute (General Statutes § 46a-51, et. seq.) to include traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles, such as braids, locs and twists.  For employers, this means that it is illegal to discriminate against applicants or employees because they maintain their natural hair or hairstyles that are closely associated with their racial identity.  Although hair texture and protective hairstyles are specifically mentioned, other traits historically associated with race may also be afforded protection under the statute.

Employers are encouraged to review their grooming policies and eliminate any provisions that may violate the CROWN Act.  This may include policies that require employees to adopt a certain hairstyle; prohibit employees from wearing certain hairstyles; or indicate a preference for certain hairstyles over others.  Employers are also encouraged to train their employees, especially managers or supervisors, to recognize and detect bias on the basis of traits historically associated with race.

Authors

Patricia E. Reilly

Member
(203) 772-7733
preilly@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Amy Abbink

Paralegal
(585) 419 -8744
aabbink@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Ercilia Gonzalez Acevedo

Paralegal
(518) 701-2771
egonzalez@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Mary M. Ackerly

Senior Counsel
(860) 600-2522
mackerly@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Gina Adams

Paralegal
(585) 419-8745
gadams@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Javid Afzali

Member
(518) 701-2775
jafzali@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Azin Ahmadi

Senior Counsel
(518) 701-2767
aahmadi@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Selma Al Taii

Associate
(585) 419-8793
saltaii@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Jordan C. Alaimo

Member
(585) 419-8855
jalaimo@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Ian Altman

Chief Financial Officer
(860) 240-6132
ialtman@harrisbeachmurtha.com

Gabriella S. Amato

Associate
(516) 880-8379
gamato@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 5, 2026 3:53 am