skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
Legal Alert
September 23, 2022

California One Step Closer to Requiring Cryptocurrency Licenses

Authors and Contacts

Paulo M. Coelho

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

California is one step closer to joining New York in requiring cryptocurrency licenses.

Governor Gavin Newsom has until September 30 to sign or veto the Digital Financial Assets Law, which would go into effect in 2025. The bill requires companies offering services that involve investing, lending, or trading cryptocurrencies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.

Proponents of the bill call it balanced and claim it establishes responsible guardrails to protect consumers, while detractors argue it produces an onerous process that will drive crypto businesses from the state – an important issue given that California is home to some notable crypto players, including Coinbase and Ripple.

Neither the licensure requirements nor the related concern and criticism are new: New York’s BitLicense regime went into effect in 2015 (the first such license was issued that year), despite criticism of over-regulation and an unduly burdensome application process. Indeed, some companies purportedly left and/or limited their services in New York as a result of the law, though New York’s Department of Financial Services has approved 31 credentials, including companies such as Robinhood, Block and Gemini.

California’s struggle with digital asset regulation now moves to the governor’s office. For now, the Governor has not indicated what he plans to do with the bill, but his decision will have meaningfully impact the digital asset industry, in particular given California’s position as a tech hub.

If you would like more information on this topic, please reach out to Paulo M. Coelho at (516) 880-8389 or pcoelho@harrisbeachmurtha.com.

This alert is not a substitute for advice of counsel on specific legal issues.

Harris Beach has offices throughout New York state, including Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Uniondale and White Plains, as well as Washington D.C., New Haven, Connecticut and Newark, New Jersey.

Authors and Contacts

Paulo Coelho

Paulo M. Coelho

Associate

Related Industries

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

Insights

California One Step Closer to Requiring Cryptocurrency Licenses

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Legal Alert
September 23, 2022

California One Step Closer to Requiring Cryptocurrency Licenses

Insight

California is one step closer to joining New York in requiring cryptocurrency licenses.

Governor Gavin Newsom has until September 30 to sign or veto the Digital Financial Assets Law, which would go into effect in 2025. The bill requires companies offering services that involve investing, lending, or trading cryptocurrencies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.

Proponents of the bill call it balanced and claim it establishes responsible guardrails to protect consumers, while detractors argue it produces an onerous process that will drive crypto businesses from the state – an important issue given that California is home to some notable crypto players, including Coinbase and Ripple.

Neither the licensure requirements nor the related concern and criticism are new: New York’s BitLicense regime went into effect in 2015 (the first such license was issued that year), despite criticism of over-regulation and an unduly burdensome application process. Indeed, some companies purportedly left and/or limited their services in New York as a result of the law, though New York’s Department of Financial Services has approved 31 credentials, including companies such as Robinhood, Block and Gemini.

California’s struggle with digital asset regulation now moves to the governor’s office. For now, the Governor has not indicated what he plans to do with the bill, but his decision will have meaningfully impact the digital asset industry, in particular given California’s position as a tech hub.

If you would like more information on this topic, please reach out to Paulo M. Coelho at (516) 880-8389 or pcoelho@harrisbeachmurtha.com.

This alert is not a substitute for advice of counsel on specific legal issues.

Harris Beach has offices throughout New York state, including Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Uniondale and White Plains, as well as Washington D.C., New Haven, Connecticut and Newark, New Jersey.

Authors

Paulo M. Coelho

Associate
(516) 880-8389
pcoelho@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 8, 2026 12:07 am