skip to main content
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Capabilities
People
main menu
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Capabilities
  • People
  • Capabilities
  • People
About
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
About
Inclusion and Engagement
Social Impact
Lateral Opportunities
Resources
Insights
News
Events
Insights
News
Events
Careers
Contact
Offices
Legal Alert
September 26, 2022

California Governor’s Vetoes Cryptocurrency Licensing

Authors and Contacts

Paulo M. Coelho

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed the Digital Financial Assets Law requiring companies offering services that involve investing, lending, or trading cryptocurrencies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.

In a letter to the California General Assembly, Newsome said licensing was a premature step given an Executive Order he issued in May and pending federal regulation.

“On May 4, 2022, I issued Executive Order N-9-22 to position California as the first state to establish a transparent regulatory environment that both fosters responsible innovation, and protects consumers who use digital asset financial services and products – all within the context of a rapidly evolving federal regulatory picture,” Newsom wrote in a message explaining his veto. “Over the last several months, my administration has conducted extensive research and outreach to gather input on approaches that balance the benefits and risk to consumers, harmonize with federal rules, and incorporate California values such as equity, inclusivity and environmental protection.”

Newsom said he shared the author of the bill’s “intent to protect Californians from potential financial harm while providing clear rules for crypto-businesses operating in this state,” but licensing was a step too far at this time.

“A more flexible approach is needed to ensure regulatory oversight can keep up with rapidly evolving technology and use cases, and is tailored with the proper tools to address trends and mitigate consumer harm,” he wrote.

Differing opinions on cryptocurrency licensing, including NY’s BitLicense

Proponents of the bill called it balanced and claimed it established responsible guardrails to protect consumers, while detractors argue it would produce an onerous process that would drive crypto businesses from the state – an important issue given that California is home to some notable crypto players, including Coinbase and Ripple.

Neither the licensure requirements nor the related concern and criticism are new: New York’s BitLicense regime went into effect in 2015 (the first such license was issued that year), despite criticism of over-regulation and an unduly burdensome application process. Indeed, some companies purportedly left and/or limited their services in New York as a result of the law, though New York’s Department of Financial Services has approved 31 credentials, including companies such as Robinhood, Block and Gemini.

If you would like more information on this topic, please reach out to Paulo M. Coelho at (516) 880-8389 or pcoelho@harrisbeachmurtha.com.

This alert is not a substitute for advice of counsel on specific legal issues.

Harris Beach has offices throughout New York state, including Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Uniondale and White Plains, as well as Washington D.C., New Haven, Connecticut and Newark, New Jersey.

Authors and Contacts

Paulo Coelho

Paulo M. Coelho

Associate

Related Industries

Facebook
(Twitter)
LinkedIn
Email
Copy Page Link

Contact Us

Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Site Map
Payment Portal
X-twitter Facebook Linkedin Instagram

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2025 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC

TRUSTe
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Back to Top

Insights

California Governor’s Vetoes Cryptocurrency Licensing

Capabilities
People
Harris Beach Murtha Attorneys at Law
Legal Alert
September 26, 2022

California Governor’s Vetoes Cryptocurrency Licensing

Insight

California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed the Digital Financial Assets Law requiring companies offering services that involve investing, lending, or trading cryptocurrencies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation.

In a letter to the California General Assembly, Newsome said licensing was a premature step given an Executive Order he issued in May and pending federal regulation.

"On May 4, 2022, I issued Executive Order N-9-22 to position California as the first state to establish a transparent regulatory environment that both fosters responsible innovation, and protects consumers who use digital asset financial services and products – all within the context of a rapidly evolving federal regulatory picture," Newsom wrote in a message explaining his veto. "Over the last several months, my administration has conducted extensive research and outreach to gather input on approaches that balance the benefits and risk to consumers, harmonize with federal rules, and incorporate California values such as equity, inclusivity and environmental protection."

Newsom said he shared the author of the bill’s “intent to protect Californians from potential financial harm while providing clear rules for crypto-businesses operating in this state,” but licensing was a step too far at this time.

“A more flexible approach is needed to ensure regulatory oversight can keep up with rapidly evolving technology and use cases, and is tailored with the proper tools to address trends and mitigate consumer harm,” he wrote.

Differing opinions on cryptocurrency licensing, including NY’s BitLicense

Proponents of the bill called it balanced and claimed it established responsible guardrails to protect consumers, while detractors argue it would produce an onerous process that would drive crypto businesses from the state – an important issue given that California is home to some notable crypto players, including Coinbase and Ripple.

Neither the licensure requirements nor the related concern and criticism are new: New York’s BitLicense regime went into effect in 2015 (the first such license was issued that year), despite criticism of over-regulation and an unduly burdensome application process. Indeed, some companies purportedly left and/or limited their services in New York as a result of the law, though New York’s Department of Financial Services has approved 31 credentials, including companies such as Robinhood, Block and Gemini.

If you would like more information on this topic, please reach out to Paulo M. Coelho at (516) 880-8389 or pcoelho@harrisbeachmurtha.com.

This alert is not a substitute for advice of counsel on specific legal issues.

Harris Beach has offices throughout New York state, including Albany, Buffalo, Ithaca, New York City, Rochester, Saratoga Springs, Syracuse, Uniondale and White Plains, as well as Washington D.C., New Haven, Connecticut and Newark, New Jersey.

Authors

Paulo M. Coelho

Associate
(516) 880-8389
pcoelho@harrisbeachmurtha.com
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. © 2026 Harris Beach Murtha Cullina PLLC
Content current as of September 14, 2026 7:52 pm